When your fundraiser dinner makes the gift only partly deductible
Sell a $100 ticket to a benefit concert with a $40 dinner attached and you owe the buyer a disclosure statement. The threshold is $75, the penalty is real, and the arithmetic is not what most boards assume.
Your ensemble sells 120 tickets to a benefit concert at $100 each. Dinner is included, and a comparable dinner in your town runs about $40. The board is delighted: $12,000 raised. Somewhere in that delight is a disclosure obligation nobody has met, and a penalty that is capped at $5,000.
This is a quid pro quo contribution — a payment made partly as a gift and partly in exchange for goods or services. The rules for it are separate from the $250 acknowledgment rule, they kick in at a lower number, and unlike that rule they carry a penalty payable by you.
The threshold is $75, and it is on the wrong number
A written disclosure statement is required whenever the donor's payment exceeds $75. Not the deductible portion — the payment. The IRS's own example is worth quoting because it is the exact shape of a band fundraiser:
For example, if a donor gives a charity $100 and receives a concert ticket valued at $40, the donor has made a quid pro quo contribution. In this example, the charitable contribution portion of the payment is $60. Even though the deductible part of the payment is not more than $75, a disclosure statement must be provided because the donor's payment exceeds $75.
IRS, Substantiating charitable contributions
So an $80 ticket with a $50 dinner attached requires a statement, even though the deductible gift is only $30. Boards consistently guess the opposite.
What the statement must say
Two things, both of them concrete:
- That the amount deductible is limited to the excess of the payment over the value of the goods or services provided.
- A good faith estimate of the value of those goods or services.
A good faith estimate is not a guess made in the parking lot. It is what a disinterested person would pay for that dinner, that ticket, that tote bag. If a nearby restaurant charges $38 for the same plate, $40 is defensible. If you priced it at $5 because a member's restaurant donated the food, that is not the estimate — the donation of the food is a separate in-kind gift, and the value to the diner is still $38.
The statement must be furnished in connection with either the solicitation or the receipt. That means the cleanest place to satisfy the rule is on the ticket page and the ticket itself, printed once, before anyone has bought anything. “$100 per seat, of which $60 is a deductible charitable contribution; the fair market value of the dinner is estimated at $40” handles all 120 buyers with no January mail merge at all.
The penalty
$10 per contribution, to a maximum of $5,000 per fundraising event or mailing. Which means a 120-ticket concert with no disclosure is a $1,200 exposure, and a large year-end mailing can reach the cap. The penalty is avoidable where the failure is due to reasonable cause, but “we did not know” is a thin foundation to build a reasonable-cause argument on when the requirement is printed in a public IRS publication.
When you can skip it
There are real exceptions, and one of them is genuinely useful to ensembles.
No donative element. If somebody buys a $30 hoodie from your merch table at roughly what a hoodie costs, that is a purchase, not a partly-deductible gift. Nothing to disclose.
Intangible religious benefits only. Relevant to a church choir, not to a municipal band.
Insubstantial value. This is the one worth knowing properly, because it is what lets you thank donors with a small item without wrecking their deduction. It comes from Rev. Proc. 90-12, and it has a structure people routinely misquote. The benefits are treated as insubstantial only if the first condition and one of the two alternatives are met:
1. The payment occurs in the context of a fund-raising campaign in which the charity informs patrons how much of their payment is a deductible contribution, and either 2. (a) The fair market value of all of the benefits received in connection with the payment, is not more than 2 percent of the payment, or $50, whichever is less, or (b) The payment is $25 (adjusted for inflation as described below) or more and the only benefits received in connection with the payment are token items (bookmarks, calendars, key chains, mugs, posters, tee shirts, etc.) bearing the organization's name or logo.
Rev. Proc. 90-12, section 3.01
Notice condition 1. The exception is not self-executing. You only get
it if your solicitation already tells patrons how much of their payment is deductible.
Rev. Proc. 90-12 even supplies the sentence to use when the benefits are
insubstantial: Under Internal Revenue Service guidelines the estimated value of the
benefits received is not substantial; therefore the full amount of your payment is a
deductible contribution.
The 2026 numbers
The dollar figures in that 1990 procedure are indexed annually, so quoting $5 / $25 / $50 from the original text will mislead you. For 2026 the IRS sets them at:
- $13.90 — the “low cost article” limit, i.e. the ceiling on your cost for token items under test (b).
- $69.50 — the minimum payment for test (b) to be available.
- $139 — the cap in test (a), applied alongside the 2 percent figure, whichever is less.
Which cashes out to something usefully concrete. A $75 donation thanked with a logo mug that cost you $9 leaves the full $75 deductible — provided your solicitation said so. A $50 donation thanked with the same mug does not qualify under test (b), because $50 is below $69.50; you would fall back to test (a), where 2 percent of $50 is $1, and a $9 mug fails it.
Check the figures each January. They move. The 2026 amounts are in Rev. Proc. 2025-32, section 3.33, and the 2027 set will be published in a similarly-numbered document in late 2026.
What to actually do this season
- For every event where the buyer gets something — dinner, a drink, a raffle entry, a program ad — decide the fair market value before tickets go on sale, and write it down along with how you arrived at it.
- Put the deductible split on the ticket page, the ticket, and the receipt. Three places, one sentence, no follow-up correspondence.
- Keep the value with the event record, not in somebody's email. Two years later a grant auditor or a donor's accountant will ask how you got to $40.
- Treat pure-donation lines and ticket lines as different things in your ledger from the start. Untangling them in January is the worst version of this task.
Rehearsal Letter records the fair market value against the event, computes the deductible portion per payment, and carries the disclosure language onto the receipt so the arithmetic does not have to be redone by hand. This article is general information and not tax advice; the amounts above are the 2026 figures and are re-indexed annually.
Sources
- IRS, Substantiating charitable contributions
- IRS, Charitable contributions — quid pro quo contributions
- Rev. Proc. 90-12 (PDF) and Rev. Proc. 92-49 (PDF)
- IRS, Rev. Proc. 2025-32 (PDF), section 3.33 — 2026 inflation-adjusted amounts
- IRS, Publication 1771 (PDF)